Web site designed and maintained by Chris Cairns  © SICS EBM Group 2004                                  

Up

 

Do kinetic beds prevent nosocomial pneumonia?

 

Bottom Line: The poor validity of this study prevents any conclusion to be drawn.
Level of evidence:
1-

Citation: De Boisblanc B, et al.Effect of air-supported, continuous postural oscillation on the risk of early ICU pneumonia in non-traumatic critical illness. Chest 1993; 103:1543–1547

Lead author's name: DeBoisblanc B

Three-part Clinical Question:

Patients: medical intensive care patients

Intervention: air-supported, continuous, oscillating bed for 5 days v. conventional beds

Outcome: pneumonia during first 5 days

 

Search Terms: Intensive care, critical care, mechanical ventilation, ventilator-associated pneumonia, nosocomial pneumonia, prevention, controlled trial

 

The Study: partly blinded, randomised trial with intention-to-treat analysis.
 

The Study Patients: 124 non-consecutive medical ICU patients
 

Control group N = 51; all analysed
 

Experimental group N = 69; all analysed including 3 patients who withdrew from the study because of discomfort

 

The Evidence:

Outcome

Time to Outcome

CER

EER

RRR

ARR

NNT

Pneumonia

5 days

0.216

0.087

0.6

0.129

NS

95% Confidence Intervals:

¥

¥

¥

 

Comments:

Medical patients were randomised to the two treatments. The study was stopped prematurely because of a lack of funding.

All patients were followed up, but only for five days. The criteria used for the diagnosis of pneumonia ensured that both community and hospital acquired pneumonias were included. The radiologists were the only people blinded to treatment groups.

It is not possible to state that the two groups were sufficiently similar at the start of the study.

No power calculation was done.

 

Appraised by: David Swann
 

Email: d.g.swann@ed.ac.uk

Kill or Update By: December 2009

Printer Friendly Version 

© SICS EBM Group 2004