Web site designed and maintained by Chris Cairns  © SICS EBM Group 2004                                  

Up

 

Do kinetic beds prevent nosocomial pneumonia?

 

Bottom Line: A small, poorly designed RCT does not answer the search question.
Level of evidence:
1-

 

Citation: Traver G, et al. Continuous oscillation: outcome in critically ill patients. J Crit Care, 1995; 10: 97-103
 

Lead author's name: Gayle Traver

 

Three-part Clinical Question:

Patients: selected patients in a general ICU

Intervention: oscillating v. conventional bed

Outcome: incidence of pneumonia – both community and hospital acquired
 

Search Terms: Intensive care, critical care, mechanical ventilation, ventilator-associated pneumonia, nosocomial pneumonia, prevention, controlled trial

 

The Study: partly blinded, randomised, intention-to-treat analysis.
 

The Study Patients: 103 ICU patients
 

Control group N = 59; all analysed
 

Experimental group N = 44; all analysed

 

The Evidence:

Outcome

Time to Outcome

CER

EER

RRR

ARR

NNT

Pneumonia

Mobilisation / death

0.288

0.182

0.37

0.106

NS

95% Confidence Intervals:

¥

¥

¥

 

Comments:

Patients admitted to two general ICUs were randomised if a kinetic bed was available. Extensive exclusion criteria limit the generalisability of the study.

Patients in the study groups seem similar.

Patients were followed up until mobilisation. The diagnosis of pneumonia was based on presence of purulent sputum + chest X-ray changes + fever/raised WBC. No bacteriological study was done. The radiologist was blinded to the treatment group. Both community-acquired and nosocomial pneumonias would have been included as outcomes.

No power calculation was done.
 

The poor design of this study prevents inclusion in a robust meta-analysis.

Appraised by: David Swann, Consultant, ICU, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh


Email: d.g.swann@ed.ac.uk

 

Kill or Update By: December 2009

 

Printer Friendly Version

 

© SICS EBM Group 2004