Infectious Complications of Ranitidine compared with Sucralfate
|
When compared with sucralfate the use of ranitidine for
gastric prophylaxis in the severely injured patient is associated with an
increased incidence of pneumonia and other infective complications but has an
insignificant affect on mortality.
Level of Evidence 1-
|
Citation/s:
Incidence of Infectious Complications Associated With the Use Of
Histamine2-Receptor Antagonists in Critically Ill Trauma Patients. O' Keefe GE
et al. Annals of Surgery. 1998. 227, (1): 120-125
Lead author's name and fax: Dr Grant E. O'Keefe. Department of Surgery,
University of Alberta, Walter MacKenzie Health Services Center, 8440-112
Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2B7
Three-part Clinical Question: Does the use of the histamine2 (H2)
blocker ranitidine, for gastric prophylaxis, lead to an increase in the occurrence
of infective complications in the severely ill when compared to sucralfate.
Search Terms: RCT, Gastrointestinal haemorrhage,
ranitidine, sucralfate
The Study:
Double-blinded randomized controlled trial with intention-to-treat.
The Study Patients: Severely injured patients managed in intensive care
(average injury severity score (ISS) 28.7). 62% severe head injury, 59% severe
chest injury, 29% severe abdominal injury. Average age 34.3. Equal distribution
between the two study groups. All patients were intubated and had gastric
drainage tubes in situ. Prophylactic antibiotics were only used for open
fractures and GI injuries (for 24hrs post-op) Pneumonia data collected
prospectively - Pneumonia defined as WCC>12,000/ml, a new or changing
infiltrate on CXR, temperature >38.5 or 15 colonies of a single pathogen by
semiqunatative culture of the intracutaneous segment of an iv catheter and a
temperature of >38.5 or 100,000/ml. For individual patients, each positive
catheter culture was counted as a separate complication, as were repeat
positive cultures after an appropriate course of antibiotics for bacteraemia. Repeat
episodes of pneumonia were defined by the presence of new pathogens on sputum
culture.
Control group (N = 47; 47 analyzed): Sulcralfate patients (47). These patients
received sucralfate 1g every 6 hours as a slurry via gastric tube.
Experimental group (N = 49; 49 analyzed): Ranitidine patients (49).
These patients received a loading dose of ranitidine of 0.5mg/kg followed by a
continuous infusion of 0.25mg/kg/hr.
The Evidence:
|
Outcome
|
Time to Outcome
|
CER
|
EER
|
RRR
|
ARR
|
NNT
|
|
Mortality
|
ICU stay
|
0.128
|
0.224
|
-75%
|
-0.096
|
-10
|
|
95% Confidence
Intervals:
|
-193% to 43%
|
-0.247 to 0.055
|
NNT = 18 to INF;
NNH = 4 to INF
|
|
Pneumonia
|
ICU stay
|
0.298
|
0.531
|
-78%
|
-0.233
|
-4
|
|
95% Confidence
Intervals:
|
-142% to -14%
|
-0.424 to -0.042
|
-24 to -2
|
|
Bacteraemia
|
ICU stay
|
0.4
|
1.12
|
-180%
|
-0.720
|
-1
|
|
95% Confidence
Intervals:
|
-204% to -156%
|
-0.815 to -0.625
|
-2 to -1
|
|
Non-Event
Outcomes
|
Time to
outcome/s
|
Control group
|
Experimental
group
|
P-value
|
|
Total infections
|
ICU stay
|
50
|
128
|
0.0014
|
|
Primary infections (excluding +ve blood cultures within
48hrs of a +ve culture from an other site with same pathogen)
|
ICU stay
|
46
|
114
|
0.0042
|
|
Non-catheter related infections (excluding all positive
semiquantitive catheter cultures)
|
ICU stay
|
44
|
102
|
0.0046
|
Comments:
1) Is this study relevant to our patients?
Trauma patients only which is not representative of most patient groups
2)Any concerns about the methodology?
Unclear whether the caring teams were blinded to study drugs.
Time of follow-up in unclear - I have presumed it is during ICU stay.
The indication for blood culture and other microbiological investigation is not
stated. Each positive culture qualified as a separate event. This could result
in a higher rate of infection in the patients which had more investigations
performed. An attempt to reduce this has been made by calculating the number of
primary infections (by excluding positive blood cultures obtained within 48hrs
of a positive culture from another site with the same pathogen)
Additional information
Reduced ICU (p=0.02) and hospital (p=0.16) stay in the sucralfate group
Appraised by: Dr Chris Cairns, Spr, ICU, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh;
Tuesday, March 12, 2002
Email: Chris.Cairns@btinternet.com
Kill or Update By: March 2005
Printer-friendly format