Web site designed and maintained by Chris Cairns  © SICS EBM Group 2004                                  

Up

 

Do antibiotic-impregnated central lines prevent catheter-related bloodstream infection?

 

Bottom Line: Antibiotic-impregnated catheters CRBSIs in hospital patients reduce CRBSIs

 

Level of evidence: 1+ (RCT with a low risk of bias)

 

Citation: Central venous catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin for the prevention of catheter-related colonization and bloodstream infections. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 267-274

Lead author's name: Raad I

 

Three-part Clinical Question:

Patients: hospital patients requiring triple-lumen CVCs

Intervention: antibiotic impregnation minocycline and rifampin or untreated central venous catheters

Outcomes: catheter colonisation and catheter related bloodstream infection (CRBSI)

 

Search Terms: Central venous catheters, Minocycline and rifampin-impregnated catheters, Bloodstream infection, Infectious complications

 

The Study: Randomised, double-blind controlled trial with intention-to treat analysis

 

The Study Patients: 298 catheters in 281 patients
 

Control group (standard CVC) n= 237; 180 analysed
 

Experimental group  (impregnated CVC) n=228; 187 analysed

 

The Evidence:

 

Outcome

Time to Outcome

CER

EER

RRR

ARR

NNT

CRBSI

At catheter removal

0.05

0

1

0.05

20

95% Confidence Intervals:

 

0.01 to 0.09

11 to 71

 

EBM questions:

 

1) Do the methods allow accurate testing of the hypothesis? Yes.

 

2) Do the statistical tests correctly test the results to allow differentiation of statistically significant results? Yes

 

3) Are conclusions valid in light of the results? Yes

 

4) Did results get omitted, and why? Yes, 32 catheters were not cultured

 

5) Did they suggest areas of further research? Yes, additional RCTs of antibiotic CVCs for short and long term use

 

6) Did they make any recommendations based on the results and were they appropriate?

Yes, antibiotic impregnated catheters reduce the incidence of CRBSI. Yes.

 

7) Is the study relevant to my clinical practice? No, these catheters are unavailable in the UK

 

8) What level of evidence does this study represent? 1+

 

9) What grade of recommendation can I make on this result alone? B

 

10) What grade of recommendation can I make when this study is considered along with other available evidence? B

 

11) Should I change my practice because of these results? Probably not

 

12) Should I audit my current practice because of these results? No, but you should be auditing CRBSI rates anyway.

 

Appraised by Dr David Swann, Consultant, ICU, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh. June 2005 

 

Email: d.g.swann@ad.ac.uk

 

Edited by CC 

Kill by Date: 2010 

 

Printer friendly view

 

©SICS EBMG 2002