Web site designed and maintained by Chris Cairns  © SICS EBM Group 2004                                  

Up

 

Do antiseptic coated central lines prevent catheter-related bloodstream infection?

 

Bottom Line: Antiseptic-bonded catheters do not prevent CRBSIs in leukaemic patients

 

Level of evidence: 1- (small study of leukaemic patients, with a high risk of bias)

 

Citation: Evaluation of chlorhexidine and silver-sulfadiazine impregnated central venous catheters for the prevention of bloodstream infection in leukaemic patients: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Hospital Infection 1997; 37: 145-156

Lead author's name: C Logghe

 

Three-part Clinical Question:

Patients: leukaemic patients

Intervention: antiseptic impregnation with silver sulphadiazine and chlorhexidine or untreated central venous catheters

Outcomes: catheter colonisation and catheter related bloodstream infection (CRBSI)

 

Search Terms: intensive care, critical care, central venous catheters, infection, prevention, controlled trial

 

The Study: Randomised, controlled trial, with intention-to treat analysis

 

The Study Patients: 680 catheters in 538 patients

 

Control group (standard CVC) n=342 catheters; all analysed
 

Experimental group (impregnated CVC) n=338 catheters, all analysed

 

The Evidence:

 

Outcome

Time to Outcome

CER

EER

RRR

ARR

NNT

CRBSI

On suspicion of sepsis

0.044

0.05

-14%

-0.006

NS

95% Confidence Intervals:

NS

NS

NS

 

EBM questions:

 

1) Do the methods allow accurate testing of the hypothesis? Yes, a power study indicated that 664 catheter insertions needed to be studied to detect an ARR of 4%

 

2) Do the statistical tests correctly test the results to allow differentiation of statistically significant results? Yes

 

3) Are conclusions valid in light of the results? Yes

 

4) Did results get omitted, and why? No

 

5) Did they suggest areas of further research? No

 

6) Did they make any recommendations based on the results and were they appropriate?

Yes

 

7) Is the study relevant to my clinical practice? Perhaps, it depends on the generalisability of this study of leukaemic patients to your practice

 

8) What level of evidence does this study represent? 1-

 

9) What grade of recommendation can I make on this result alone? N/A

 

10) What grade of recommendation can I make when this study is considered

along with other available evidence? A – see topic summary

 

11) Should I change my practice because of these results? Perhaps- it depends on your views about the validity and importance of pooled analysis of RCTs

 

12) Should I audit my current practice because of these results? No, but you should be auditing CRBSI rates anyway.

 

Appraised by Dr David Swann, Consultant, ICU, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh. June 2005 

 

Email: d.g.swann@ad.ac.uk

 

Edited by CC 

Kill by Date: 2010 

Printer friendly view

 

©SICS EBMG 2002